Earlier on, Adreno was known as Imageon when it was first developed by ATI Technologies (which later got acquired by AMD). The Adreno GPUs are designed by Qualcomm and are used in their Snapdragon Processor lineup. You can read more about ARM’s Mali GPU on its official website. This is one of the reasons why the GPU Performance of Exynos, Kirin and MediaTek chips is lagging behind when compared to Qualcomm Snapdragon and Apple A-Series. And the same also reflects in our rankings. Though architecture plays the biggest role in their performance, the number of cores and frequency also does affect the performance.Īs of 2018, the latest Mali GPUs are quite behind the Adreno and Apple GPUs in terms of performance. For example, the “Mali-T880 MP12” has 12 cores. The number behind Mali Chip represents the number of processing units or cores. They often implement various variants of the GPU which might have different cores and frequency. These companies incorporate the Mali Architecture and implement it in their SOC. Just like their CPU Architecture, ARM Holdings also licenses the Mali GPU architecture to various chip manufacturers like Huawei HiSilicon, MediaTek, and Samsung. The Mali GPUs can be seen on MediaTek, HiSilicon Kirin, and Exynos SOCs while the Adreno GPUs are designed by Qualcomm for Snapdragon Processors. Here’s a brief description of the various GPU Brands that you see in the smartphone market. The performance difference is generally a lot more than the difference in scores. A GPU with a score of 115 is not 15% faster than the GPU with a score of 100. Our score does not increase linearly with performance improvement. Here are the Top 35 GPUs represented graphically. Just like the GPUs, you can also check out the ranking of Mobile SOCs here. We will update them with actual scores after we complete the testing. * The scores marked with a star (*) are only estimated based on the specification & the performance gain we are expecting based on the architectural improvements, GPU Cores, and clock speeds. Apple M2 Series M2 Max 38-Core GPUĪpple MacBook M2 16 GB: Apple M2, 15.30", 1.5 kg External Review » Apple MacBook M2 16 GBĪpple iPad Pro 11 2022: Apple M2, 11.00", 0.5 kg External Review » Apple iPad Pro 11 2022Īpple iPad Pro 12.9 2022: Apple M2, 12.90", 0.7 kg External Review » Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022Īpple MacBook M2: Apple M2, 13.30", 1.4 kg External Review » Apple MacBook M2Īpple MacBook M2 16 GB: Apple M2, 15.30", 1.5 kg » Apple's MacBook Air 15 M2 is expensive, but practically unrivaledĪpple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU: Apple M2, 13.60", 1.2 kg » Apple stopped M2 chip production over low MacBook sales as Samsung preps the new OLED Air displayĪpple iPad Pro 12.9 2022: Apple M2, 12.90", 0.7 kg » Apple M1 iPad Pro 12.9 variants now on sale with steep discounts up to US$800 for limited time » Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2022): More than a simple model update not necessaryĪpple MacBook M2: Apple M2, 13.30", 1.MediaTek Dimensity 1200, 1100, 1000+, & 1000 The power consumption is around 13.5 Watt (in our tests under load of the MBP13) and up to 15W according to Apple. The M2 chip is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). Compared to other iGPUs from AMD and Intel, the M2 benefits greatly from the unified memory architecture and the high bandwidth. In our benchmarks, the GPU was able to top the M1 with up to 40%, but still stays behind the 14-core GPU in the M1 Pro. The theoretical performance is rated at 3.6 Teraflops and therefore 1 TFLOP higher than the M1 8-core GPU. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC (up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 with 100 GB/s bandwidth) and should offer 160 execution units.Īccording to Apple it offers a 25% higher performance at slightly higher power consumption. The Apple M2 GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |